Comments for WASHINGTON ACTION FOR SAFE WATER

Comment on Occupy-Seattle-Flier-10-21-11 by FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION » Occupy Seattle Flier 10-21-11

FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION » Occupy Seattle Flier 10-21-11 — Sat, 07 Jan 2012 10:55:06 +0000

[...] PROFITABLE FRAUD BY MEGA CHEMICAL COMPANIES ADDS LEAD, ARSENIC, SILICOFLUORIDE TO DRINKING WATER Notice of Liability Served on Seattle and Everett Suit Filed in Federal Court in San Diego Suit Filed in Federal Court in Maryland Access links online at: http:/Fluoride-Class-Action.com/occupy-seattle-flier-10-21-11 [...]

Comment on Fluoridated water is not safe for babies by Gary Flanzer

Gary Flanzer — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 23:29:05 +0000

Tuesday 12/20/11 on Dr Oz. What’s in your drinking water?

Comment on Fluoridated water is not safe for babies by Gary Flanzer

Gary Flanzer — Fri, 16 Dec 2011 02:08:25 +0000

Live Seychelle seminar on Fluoride removal from water. http://www.shelfreliance.com/livestream?utm_source=Master+List&utm_campaign=19f5cc953d-Decdember_13_2011_Newsletter12_12_2011&utm_medium=email

Comment on Should we change our name? by Ronnie from Negaunee

Ronnie from Negaunee — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 10:58:48 +0000

This is an interesting question. There have been -how many?- 200 successful campaigns by organized groups. Is there a list somewhere – at FAN??- of the successes and the name of the group that got the job done? If “FLUORIDE FREE ___________ ” was a dominate name it just might be worth a name change. May be statistically significant

It doesn’t mean you have to give up WASA. Just as corporations can have a name AND a DBA (doing business as) .

Ron

Comment on Should we change our name? by Rae Nadler-Olenick

Rae Nadler-Olenick — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 07:13:07 +0000

If WASW truly expends as much time and effort on other aspects of water safety as it does on fluoride, then it’s appropriately named. However, that’s not true of most anti-fluoridation advocacy groups, and, after careful consideration, I believe a strong across-the-board Fluoride Free ______________ presence would make an excellent unifying theme for our movement as a whole. It’s succinct and catchy and the alliteration of the first two words is a plus.

When I first adopted the Fluoride Free Austin name unilaterally three years ago, I actually had to defend my choice – not because so many people think fluoride is good and antifluori-dationists are nut jobs but because some strong voices among us thought the word was “too negative”, a turnoff, bad karma, reminiscent of Dr. Strangelove, and the like. While I understood and respected their point of view, I felt it made no sense to crusade against something without naming it, and that if things were that far gone, we might as well throw in the towel. So I stuck to my guns despite some early doubts, and today we’re all happy with our “brand’s” success.

The further argument that “Fluoride Free” doesn’t mean 100% fluoride free is also well taken, but a similar objection could be raised with any other name given to an organization that focuses principally on ending the fluoridation of drinking water. “Clean water” doesn’t entirely cut it, because the addition of fluoride to water doesn’t make it “dirty” in the commonly accepted sense. And turning off the fluoride tap alone won’t make water still contaminated with industrial and pharmaceutical wastes completely safe – just safer than it was before. I think most people understand “fluoride free” in our context to mean tapwater free of artificially-added fluoride. Let’s concentrate on getting rid of that first, and then we can change our names to something else.

Comment on Should we change our name? by charlotte hunt

charlotte hunt — Sun, 04 Dec 2011 05:32:46 +0000

Why not have both names. Fluoride Free could be apart of the overall movement to have safe water as a right for everyone. If you decide on Fluoride Free as a name change,I vote Fluoride Free Washington.

Comment on Press-Release-HHS by Press Release – WASW to Occupy Seattle City Hall Monday at Noon to Protest Lead, Arsenic, Silicofluoride Added to Water | WASHINGTON ACTION FOR SAFE WATER

Sat, 26 Nov 2011 04:05:36 +0000

[...] Press Release – January 2011 – in response to US Health & Human Services Proposal to reduce maximum amount of fluoride added to water to 0.7 ppm. [...]

Comment on Press Release by richard sauerheber

richard sauerheber — Sat, 26 Nov 2011 01:15:21 +0000

@Victor Barry If you feel as strongly about defending children as we do, then you might wish to read "The Case Against Fluoride", 2010 by Paul Connett and co-authors, and also the National Research Council's "Fluoride in Drinking Water, a Scientific Review of EPA's Standards", 2006. These present reasonably the science behind the fact that swallowed synthetic fluoride is useless in fighting caries and causes harm from the blood at 0.21 ppm from drinking water consumption. The FDA correctly ruled decades ago that added fluorides in drinking water are an uncontrolled use of a drug, and that fluoride is not a mineral nutrient. Toxicologists, biochemists and fluorine chemists have known this for a very long time. It's just too bad we now have an epidemic of hip fractures in U.S. elderly who consume fluoridated water all their lives, and also an endemic of tooth fluorosis, afflicting 40% of U.S. children aged 12-15 with permanent abnormal enamel and a corrupted smile, because of this false treatment.

Comment on Why does St. Petersberg City Hall drink bottled water? by Anita Knight

Anita Knight — Sat, 19 Nov 2011 00:03:06 +0000

Pinellas County did vote out fluoridation, however, St. Petersburg did not and has their own water source. So we are still poisoned.

Comment on Port Angeles by P R L

P R L — Fri, 18 Nov 2011 23:40:53 +0000

.’..TIS SAID THAT GOOD THINGS TAKE TIME – BUT – GOOD GRIEF – THIS IS TAKING ITS OWN SWEET GOOD TIME – BUT THEN AGAIN – TIME IS ON OUR SIDE – JUS’ AS LONG AS WE KEEP ON – ‘KEEPIN’ ON !!!… ……………………..

Comment on Press Release by Ian

Ian — Sat, 12 Nov 2011 13:17:51 +0000

Please link to this interview on your site, or share it via email with others, it was a great interview about the victory
against fluoridation in Pinellas County:

Pinellas County City Council in Florida voted to remove fluoridation from the city drinking water. (700,000 residents of Tampa-St. Petersburg region on West coast of Florida)

Commissioner Norm Roach, who championed the effort, is interviewed by Dr. Stan Monteith on his victory against public drinking water fluoridation:

audio:
http://radiolibertyarchives.gsradio.net:8080/110111c.mp3

Pinellas County Commission votes to remove toxic fluoride from water supply of more than 700,000 Floridians :

http://www.naturalnews.com/033801_fluoride_water_supply.html#ixzz1d3brx4QK

Comment on Press Release – For Candidates by FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION » Post Links to Facebook-Twitter

FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION » Post Links to Facebook-Twitter — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:54:03 +0000

[...] http://washingtonsafewater.com/press-release/press-release-for-candidates/ [...]

Comment on Press Release – For Candidates by WASHINGTON ACTION FOR SAFE WATER » Post Links to Facebook

WASHINGTON ACTION FOR SAFE WATER » Post Links to Facebook — Sun, 06 Nov 2011 03:52:18 +0000

[...] Press Release – For Candidates [...]

Comment on Press Release – For Candidates by Jim

Jim — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 17:09:22 +0000

Also Maryland Federal court has litigation from a 13 year old girl with 17 teeth mild(but ugly) dental fluorosis. Suit is for 75,000 but triple damage because of fraud for lifetime repairs.
San Diego MWD with 18 million also has lawsuit with 8 different damaged groups each with different damage and risks. This is not just about teeth and asks for real FDA proof of benefit for industrial sludge sold as medicant to cure disease. NSF stand 60 falls far short as they fail to meet even their own standards when testing. No specific toxicology profile is provided for the many toxic contaminates known in the product.
Mr deal has excellent coverage of all of these issues in great detail on the site. I am now sending out the material to several cities. Ormond Beach Fl has 3 attorneys on the 5 member commission. Years ago they had banned me from ever speaking about fluoridation and the First amendment foundation refused to take my case then. Two of the attorneys were elected and now all can speak at public comments again.
Daytona Beach Fl the last few months has public comments to a near empty room at 530p before the 6p meeting. All had agreed to attend but many times not one commissioner was there. The clerk is their but the video is not sent out to the public with the meeting. It is like it never happened. Sort of flipping off the public. They wanted to avoid negative comments and misinformation. That is their job I guess from what I see. So we can object to a blank wall instead of a blank stare as typical of the commission all too often.
Keep up the great work James. We are reaching the tipping point. See the Boland report.com to see how the CDC is being exposed with FOI and lawsuit EMAIL releases after a 6 year effort. This is on the Mercury is safe data created by outright fraud by the CDC and millions in cash. Then Poul Thorsen is being sued by DOJ in Atlanta for fraud against the CDC and money laundering after committing study fraud for the CDC. They thought you could trust a liar to not steal your money. Sort of like a drug deal gone bad. They do not call the cops to get their money back usually. The CDC for some reason.

Comment on ADA and HHS Conspire to Squelch Fluoridegate by Rae Nadler-Olenick

Rae Nadler-Olenick — Sat, 05 Nov 2011 16:44:17 +0000

What was the outcome of the discussions with Dr. Koh? Did the CDC’s Division of Oral Health maintain its standing, or was it downgraded to a branch? Or is that decision still pending? I never did hear.

Comment on Press Release by James Robert Deal

James Robert Deal — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:11:02 +0000

This reply is typical of those who support drinking water fluoridation. They are so completely programmed that white has become black and black has become white.

Comment on Press Release by Victor Barry

Victor Barry — Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:18:05 +0000

You people are sick. How can you sacrifice the oral health of innocent children for your own twisted, self indulgent dilusions? How can you sleep at night? Science is the search for the truth. You deal in junk science. Shame on you.

Comment on Occupy-Seattle-Flier-10-21-11 by FLUORIDE CLASS ACTION » Press Release – Showdown At City Hall – Monday 10-31-11 – Please come

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 00:37:39 +0000

[...] will occupy the foyer of the Seattle Municipal Building to deliver this press release, hand out fliers, and as a group deliver them to the mayor, city council members, and city [...]

Comment on Occupy-Seattle-Flier-10-21-11 by Jared W. Jarvi

Jared W. Jarvi — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 17:24:13 +0000

THANKS FOR TAKING A STAND TO SHARE THIS INFORMATION, PERHAPS IN THE FUTURE SUCH DATA WOULD MAKE LEGAL ACTIONS FOR DEEDS SUCH AS TOXIC MANIPULATION A THING OF THE PAST.

IN TODAYS AGE OF BUDETARY MELTDOWNS JUST FACTORING THE COST OF MEDICAL CARE NEEDED TO UNDO DAMAGES WOULD BREAK THE SYSTEM ALONE.

YOUR VOICE IS APPRECIATED.

Comment on Press Release – WASW to Occupy Seattle City Hall Monday at Noon to Protest Lead, Arsenic, Silicofluoride Added to Water by P R L

P R L — Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:07:22 +0000

…THANK YOU, JAMES… …